The interim versions are still on my computer.) (Like what happened to Timerize 68k I released 1.4 to replace 1.0, simply because I never uploaded 1.2 and 1.3. Sometimes, however, I don't get to a computer in time, and I continue programming, so released programs may end up increased by. When I've fixed it to the point that it does, I increase the version number by 0.1. I don't know, I think we all just make up our own way.Įvery time I add several new things to a program, I check it and make sure the entire program works. IS there even a method, or does it vary for every programmer? I have yet to comprehend the method behind the madness of version numbers. Yeah, why didn't they just name it 2.23? Maybe they made some major changes and changed it to 2.30 becuase it was a large update or something. I didn't have to reboot to install it (under XP), which I believe is an improvement. I have absolutely NO idea why TI Connect 1.6 is now compatible with Windows XP SP2.version 1.5.3 was just as compatible. Thanks man ýne of my problems resolved now. Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: TI Connect v1.6 ReleasedĪt least linking doesn't interfere with firewalls.ĭoes it have IRQ monitoring so that it doesn't randomly search through COM ports and disconnect my modem? Does it still let you download any APP without paying for them like 1.5? >.such as the warning that firewalls may interfere with linking. I also dont understand why it went from 2.22 to 2.30. I have an 83+ I wonder if they're gonna come out with a new 83+ OS. Their views are not necessarily those of, and takes no responsibility for their content. The comments below are written by visitors. Those of you with a 84+/84+ SE will also want to download the newly released v2.30 operating system. Some notable idiosyncrasies remain, such as the warning that firewalls may interfere with linking. Most of the changes appear to be nonvisible to the user. TI has finally released version 1.6 of their TI Connect linking software. Posted by Michael on 24 January 2005, 03:35 GMT
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |